It can be difficult to choose the best network simulator or emulator when preparing for the eve ng cloud. Furthermore, there is no ideal method to approach the process of choosing. It is not really possible to evaluate every software separately. Due to the fact that everyone has an opinion, we can most likely rely on suggestions on the eve ng cloud.
Everyone has a preferred simulator or emulator, whether it was suggested by a coworker, manager, or by any topic. Anyone who exclusively uses eve ng cloud will consistently assert it is superior, and vice versa.
On the simulator side, there are also camps that have been set up. That does not help with the decision-making at all. Each piece of software, objectively, has a unique set of benefits and drawbacks. Exactly that is what we will examine. Instead of the race, let us take a step back and examine the software itself.
A piece of software called a simulator, as the name suggests, replicates a network architecture made up of one or more network devices. Simulated network devices cannot pass live network traffic in the same manner that actual network devices can. This is because they are not actual network devices. Instead, each network device is a piece of software that does the best it can to pass for a real network device.
Network devices within a simulator are therefore constrained to the features and commands specified in the simulation. Due to this, many sophisticated capabilities that actual network devices are capable of such as eve ng internet access, Policy Based Routing, and others that are absent from their simulated counterparts.
Simulators’ main advantage is that they frequently weigh incredibly little. Simulator software does not have to worry about CPU, memory, or storage needs to run on almost any modern computer.